On 1/8/15 8:19 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote:
What kind of action would you expect? Renaming a name
which has been used for two years now without complaints, simply
because it looks bad in the new documentation?
As we usually don't rename functions with inconsistent naming or
otherwise bad names because of backwards compatibility (TM) I guess
that's not what you want. OTOH I'm not sure if ddox could be much
improved in this regard. Maybe it shouldn't display the full name,
only Class.member. But I don't really know what you expect.
I was thinking along the way of simplifying documentation and links. --
Andrei
