Am Thu, 08 Jan 2015 08:27:50 -0800 schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org>:
> On 1/8/15 8:19 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: > > What kind of action would you expect? Renaming a name > > which has been used for two years now without complaints, simply > > because it looks bad in the new documentation? > > > > As we usually don't rename functions with inconsistent naming or > > otherwise bad names because of backwards compatibility (TM) I guess > > that's not what you want. OTOH I'm not sure if ddox could be much > > improved in this regard. Maybe it shouldn't display the full name, > > only Class.member. But I don't really know what you expect. > > I was thinking along the way of simplifying documentation and links. > -- Andrei I guess that should be done by somebody familiar with the ddox codebase then. Two small improvements that could help: * Make names/filenames case sensitive * display only shortened names (Class.member, Module.member) This leaves the URL/link problem but I don't know how that could be solved.
