On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 21:37:54 +0000
via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 21:29:40 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
> wrote:
> > How's that? The current runtime aborts on memory allocation 
> > inside the GC collection routine, it's not a memory safety 
> > issue.
> 
> Spurious race conditions in memory deallocation patterns that 
> remain undetected and cause random crashes after deployment are 
> ok? That is not memory safety, it is "memory safety".
> 
> The language should prevent this.
and the funniest thing that it is perfectly able to do that! all the
code is already there.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to