On Wednesday, 21 January 2015 at 09:03:32 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
You assert that something is too expensive for system
language, which is not a negative, so the burden of proof is
on you, substantiate your claim or you are just generating
noise.
Oh... But you are the one that is challenging the status quo.
Not me. The excitement created by Rust is proof enough for what
the status quo is.
That's irrelevant. Once again, you are giving into the rhetoric
bullshit. Or, as to quote Coluche « C'est pas parce qu'il sont
nombreux à avoir tort qu'ils ont raison » that I would translate
by "It is not because many of them are wrong that they are right."
What is the status quo is irrelevant. You make a claim, you
substantiate.
