On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 21:37:56 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 20 January 2015 at 21:29:40 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
How's that? The current runtime aborts on memory allocation
inside the GC collection routine, it's not a memory safety
issue.
Spurious race conditions in memory deallocation patterns that
remain undetected and cause random crashes after deployment are
ok? That is not memory safety, it is "memory safety".
The language should prevent this.
That is GC implementation issue, not a language issue. If it
ain't broken, don't fix it.
