On 2/24/15 9:35 AM, "Ulrich =?UTF-8?B?S8O8dHRsZXIi?=
<kuett...@gmail.com>" wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 16:18:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/24/15 4:44 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= <schue...@gmx.net>"
wrote:
As one example, here is what I originally suggested:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope
Walter and I discussed this proposal at length several times.
Is there a place where the outcome of such discussions is documented?
This feels inappropriate like asking for additional paperwork. Still,
there are so many heated discussions going on here. It might be helpful
to know what was considered, what was decided and for what reason. Then
again, maybe I just did not get the memo.
Closest thing to documentation are http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP69 and
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP25, both of which came at the same time
inspired by that work, and in reaction to its complexity. We are looking
at what parts of DIP69 are simplified/obviated by DIP25. If we can get
away with no DIP69 at all, so much the better. -- Andrei
