Re: Memory safety depends entirely on GC ?

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 24 February 2015 at 18:01:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
On 2/24/15 9:47 AM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= 
<schue...@gmx.net>" wrote:
Out of interest, because that will be crucial for the further
development: are you completely opposed to any kind of 
ownership system,
or is it something specific about this particular proposal 
that you
don't like?

There's no opposition on matters of principle/dogma. It's just 
too complicated for what it provides.

Andrei

Compared to what ?