On 3/14/2015 8:41 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 23:47:24 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/14/2015 3:19 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Saturday, 14 March 2015 at 19:48:14 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
The point is, with a library abstraction the core language can be simplified.
D's ability to create user defined literals largely ends the pressure to make
more complicated and specialized core language literals.
It makes it sounds like you don't know the spec about string literals.
I know I don't know what you're driving at :-)
That we have a large number of string literals, in the core of the language,
many of which could probably be language construct.
I haven't looked into it - anything in particular you have in mind?
I'd also prefer to get rid of /+ +/ comments, I thought they'd be more useful
than they are.
