On 16/04/2015 12:00 a.m., "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?=
<ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com>" wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 April 2015 at 11:45:37 UTC, XavierAP wrote:
I understand such a library collection would have many holes right
now, but movement also creates its own momentum. I just think it would
be good that dlang.org provided some more guidance.
Yes, there is a lot of overlap in the D community: 4 D compiler
projects, a bunch of IDE projects, a bunch of GUI library projects, a
bunch of (basic) game engine projects... All rather large in scope if
you want to reach a complete state.
What is needed is a committee ;). But seriously, if you had a nice
public API design on paper then maybe people would flock behind the
same project rather than creating their own. Unless they do it for
educational reasons/entertainment.
Nope. Good API isn't good enough. For things like window creation, image
library ext. If they ain't in phobos, it ain't gonna get used.
That's my experience with Devisualization anyway.
