Walter Bright wrote: ... > > Think of what it provides as very similar to what ddoc does, except that > instead of being in a human-readable format it would be a > machine-readable one. > > In other words, for each module you'll be able to get > > . all the symbols in that module, and the members of those symbols > (recursively) > . the file/line of the source location of each symbol > . the ddoc comment for each symbol > . the type of each symbol > > Things could be added over time, I was just thinking of this for starters.
What about file/line/column of the symbol? Is this much work / hard work to add?