On Monday, 4 May 2015 at 19:28:25 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-05-03 19:39, Robert burner Schadek wrote:
Not much code yet, I'm currently building the performance test
suite
https://github.com/burner/std.xml2
I recommend benchmarking against the Tango pull parser.
Recently, I compared DOM parsers for an XML files of 100 MByte:
15.8 s tango.text.xml (SiegeLord/Tango-D2)
13.4 s ae.utils.xml (CyberShadow/ae)
8.5 s xml.etree (Python)
Either the Tango DOM parser is slow compared to the Tango pull
parser,
or the D2 port ruined the performance.
