On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 12:34:49 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2015 12:07:09 +0000
Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com>
wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 11:53:00 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
> I have thought of that too. But I haven't been able to come
> up with a syntax that looks good and doesn't conflict with
> any existing syntax/symbol. The above syntax is already used
> for template instantiation.
What if use the symbol '#' ?
Yep, I like this symbol for macro too.
What's wrong with using the word macro? We don't want symbol soup.