On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 15:20:38 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 12:39:52 UTC, ixid wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 12:34:49 UTC, Daniel Kozák wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2015 12:07:09 +0000
Dennis Ritchie via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 11:53:00 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
> I have thought of that too. But I haven't been able to
> come up with a syntax that looks good and doesn't conflict
> with any existing syntax/symbol. The above syntax is
> already used for template instantiation.
What if use the symbol '#' ?
Yep, I like this symbol for macro too.
What's wrong with using the word macro? We don't want symbol
soup.
this, there's a reason people don't use lisp.
Lisp is not used due to other reasons, symbol soup typical for
Perl :)
$? ? s:;s:s;;$?: : s;;=]=>%-{<-|}<&|`{; ;
y; -/:-@[-`{-};`-{/" -; ;
s;;$_;see
