"ponce" <cont...@gam3sfrommars.fr> wrote: > C++'s constexpr looks broken because everything must be marked > constexpre, which defeats the purpose of having compile-time code looking > like runtime code. But I never had the pleasure to use it.
constexpr functions are just as well runtime functions. They are only annotated that they are usable in a constant expression. I don't think it's fair to call that broken regarding all the attributes that D functions can take... Tobi
