On 6/8/15 2:43 PM, Tobias Müller wrote:
"ponce" <cont...@gam3sfrommars.fr> wrote:
C++'s constexpr looks broken because everything must be marked
constexpre, which defeats the purpose of having compile-time code looking
like runtime code. But I never had the pleasure to use it.
constexpr functions are just as well runtime functions. They are only
annotated that they are usable in a constant expression.
I don't think it's fair to call that broken regarding all the attributes
that D functions can take...
"A job well done" doesn't quite spring to mind, either.
FWIW, a reference to D came about on
http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/392jxf/modules_wont_make_it_in_c17/.
Andrei
