On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 15:29:34 UTC, ixid wrote:
On Wednesday, 17 June 2015 at 14:57:40 UTC, Wyatt wrote:
but std.collection isn't nearly so good a name.
std.container2 and so on?
Dunno. That's not something that really needs addressed right
now, is it? Off-the-cuff, in an ideal world there would be some
way of easily knowing which API was intended and forwarding to
std.deprecated on an as-needed basis (with a warning when it
happens). But "sanity" and "API versioning" may exist at
opposite ends of a spectrum, if I recall my history.
-Wyatt
