On 06/18/2015 05:21 PM, "Ola Fosheim =?UTF-8?B?R3LDuHN0YWQi?= <ola.fosheim.grostad+dl...@gmail.com>" wrote:

Yeah. This fallback thing does not make much sense. They say WebAssembly
will reduce the file size by 7% after compression compared to asm.js .
Who cares?

In my experience performance issues usually are in the layout/render
engine, or something related to it.


The layout/render stuff has to support so much dynamic-DOM cruft on every...single...element...of the page, it's pretty much inevitable that the browser itself is where the bottleneck is on a normal page, rather than network. (Which is really weird if you look at it from the perspective of someone who remembers dial-up.)

Reply via email to