On Tuesday, 30 June 2015 at 08:06:37 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
1) What's there already, namely `shouldEquals`, `shouldBeIn`,
etc.
2a) Compile-time strings for operators: `should!"=="`,
`should!"in"`
2b) Dicebot's `test!"=="`. `assert` is so much better, I wish
we could use that.
3) Composable ones: should.equals, should.not.equals, or
another word that isn't "should"
4) Anything else?
- snip -
Thoughts? Votes?
I really hate the 3rd persons "s" in "shouldEquals" /
"should.equals". Not only is it grammatically wrong, it's also
inconsistent with "shouldBeIn", which - following the same scheme
- would have to be "shouldIsIn".
