On Tuesday, 30 June 2015 at 12:42:40 UTC, Sebastiaan Koppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 June 2015 at 08:06:37 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
Much rather prefer the composable ones over the `shouldEquals`,
simply for readability and easy extending.
These days I am leaning towards BDD, but everybody has his
favorite. Maybe just providing the low-level details in
std.testing would enough; e.g. a test runner, UDA's and
assertions.
Then everyone can write his on version of given().when().then()
on top of it. Or simply make a pull-request for std.testing.bdd
Yeah, I'm starting to think it might be better to delete
`should.d` from my current PR, try to get the rest approved then
work on where the community wants the fancy assertions to go.
It's a shame though because I think it's a massively important
piece of the whole thing. It's a night and day difference when a
test fails.
Atila
