On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 11:50:09 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 28 July 2015 at 10:16:21 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
[...]
Sorry, but this is unhelpful. All you are saying here is that
"TypeTuple" is bad. Yes, but we already know that. Everyone
agrees on that.
The real question is: _What exactly_ is the problem with
TypeTuple? The "Type" part of the name? The "Tuple" part? The
combination? Maybe it's not the name at all, but the concept,
or only some part of its behaviour?
Nothing in your post gives us a clue which kind of name would
be better. In particular, it doesn't show that `AliasSeq` is
any better than `TypeTuple`. So we're changing it from a bad
name to one that could be even worse, for all we know.
It seems you and deadalnix actually have useful evidence that
can answer these questions, but neither of you posted them.
Please do!
As already posted in the bike-shedding thread, I'm fine with
'Aliases'.
Or AliasSeq.
Or everything that does not have the 'tuple' or 'type' part in it.
I'm so desperate I would be fine with 'Arguments'!
Please just proceed with something TOTALLY different for this
concept
---
Paolo
