On Sunday, 30 August 2015 at 02:44:51 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
Maybe we should rebrand it to be the "development preview
compiler" and make gdc the "stable production compiler". or
something.
Then people write code that works on dmd just to realize GDC is
2-3 versions behind and doesn't compile their code(no offense
meant to the GDC team)
That would be expected if dmd is the preview release and gdc is
the stable release.
It'd be like using 2.1-alpha and expecting all the new stuff to
still work when you switch to 2.0.
