On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 19:50:57 UTC, Fool wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 19:48:35 UTC, Fool wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 19:46:47 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 19:44:18 UTC, Fool wrote:
Non-reflexive '<=' does not make any sense at all.
It might be a bit of a mess, agreed, but nonetheless:
assert(!(float.nan <= float.nan));
Agreed, but in case of float '<=' is not an order at all.
By the way, that implies that the result of sorting an array of
float by default comparison is undefined unless the array does
not contain NaN.
Didn't think of that. Yikes. Should we change the default
predicate of std.algorithm.sort to std.math.cmp when
ElementType!R is floating point?
