On 18.02.2016 13:03, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/18/2016 2:47 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 18.02.2016 10:24, Walter Bright wrote:
On 2/17/2016 11:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
const(headconst(T)) is the same as const(T), no?
Er, yes?
Jonathan wanted to embed a mutable reference count within a const object.
Contrary to your suggestion, headconst won't help with that.
Of course it will:
headconst pointer -> pointer -> refcount
-> const pointer -> ... constant stuff ...
He wanted to embed a mutable reference count literally within a const
object. Not a headconst object.
