On Thursday, 3 March 2016 at 11:16:03 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 21:00:30 UTC, Erik Smith wrote:
I'm back to actively working on a std.database specification &
implementation. It's still unstable, minimally tested, and
there is plenty of work to do, but I wanted to share an update
on my progress.
I suggest you call the package stdx.db - it is not (and may not
become) a standard package, so `std` is out of question. If it
is supposed to be *proposed* as standard package, then `stdx`
is good because that is what some people have used in the past
(while others used the ugly std.experimental. for the same
purpose).
I humbly believe that this effort **must** be collaborative as
such package is doomed to fail if done wrong.
std.experimental, ugly or not, is what is in phobos.
See std.experimental.allocator, std.experimental.logger and
std.experimental.ndslice