On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 18:17:57 UTC, tsbockman wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 17:42:01 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
On 05/04/2016 12:16 PM, deadalnix wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 May 2016 at 15:46:13 UTC, Nick Sabalausky
wrote:
Hard to tell for certain, but you ARE being sarcastic/joking
about
this, right?
The concept of sarcasm plays a central role in understanding
society's
inevitable development from bourgeois oppression, which, in
turn,
amplify existing structures of exclusion. Please educate
yourself.
That really doesn't answer the question, but that's ok, wasn't
really that important of a question to me.
Poe's law strikes again!
Really though, deadalnix is being ultra-sarcastic. Check out
his more serious comments from the last thread touching on this
subject, if you want to know what he really thinks:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/wongmdtjgsgsmxmyu...@forum.dlang.org
Yup. How sad it is that gibberish nonsense can actually looks
like it is being written seriously.
