On 5/9/2016 11:51 AM, tsbockman wrote:
On Monday, 9 May 2016 at 18:37:10 UTC, Xinok wrote:
(4) While we're at it, let's also emit a warning when comparing signed and
unsigned types.
(4) is already planned; it's just taking *a lot* longer than anticipated to
actually implement it:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/1913
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/5229
I oppose this change. You'd be better off not having unsigned types at all than
this mess, which was Java's choice. But then there are more problems created.
