On 6/10/16 3:17 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 06/04/2016 09:32 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Sounds good to me, thanks. Delegation/lieutenantship/empowering for the
win. I think we should also secure Martin's buy-in to make sure. -- Andrei
I'm fine with switching to ddox, could have happened a while ago.
Would be worth to switch for the auto-complete alone.
Awesome!
I should add that it would be valuable to keep the ddoc build as well.
In my introductory material on D I discuss the basic elements of
distribution: function, unittest, doc, deployment. It is compelling to
mention that we build the stdlib documentation using the same means. An
introduction to ddox at that point would be too much, and mentioning
that "well ddoc isn't good enough for the official stdlib doc" does not
sit well.
I'd want to disable or replace discourse before we make it our official
documentation. We could easily self-host some commenting functionality
if deemed necessary, but adding an unmaintained communication channel
isn't the best idea IMO.
I'm a bit bummed about that. I like it. Is my understanding incorrect
that disqus is fairly established by now? I see it on a bunch of legit
sites, and it seems to add value to those as it could add to ours.
Andrei
