On Thursday, 29 September 2016 at 18:38:42 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Then you could always do something like a.myOp!"<"(b) and
a.myOp!">="(b) if you still want to have the operator in there
somewhere. You can name the functions whatever you want. You
just can't use overloaded operators for it, since it would not
be in line with what the operators are supposed to mean and be
used for.
- Jonathan M Davis
Also with mixins and a CTFE D parser you could replace the
operators by any desired function calls.
