On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 10:35:23 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 10:11:19 UTC, Basile B. wrote:
On Thursday, 22 December 2016 at 04:11:54 UTC, Chris Wright
wrote:
While we're talking about this, this proposal breaks any
string mixin that mixes in an identifier detected with
reflection.
RIP DIP 1007. It was too simple to be true.
I see something to do to continue the DIP
[...]
Which means that you can use As many # as you want to escape a
keyword.
Mixins cannot introspect themselves so basically 'pound pound'
will always work.
And this is still a simple thing that can be done in the lexer.
no...it's dead, obviously whatever is the amount of #, they'll be
removed when the token is patched for the first time. This just
doesn't work with mixins. End of story.
