On 12/30/16 11:10 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2016 21:13:19 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:DIP1005 can't be in the business of arguing that encapsulation is good by means of examples.Right. I said we should talk about the concrete benefits of the proposal instead of talking about encapsulation.
Why would the DIP hamstring itself by not discussing its most important advantage? -- Andrei
