On Friday, 10 March 2017 at 07:58:36 UTC, Petar Kirov
[ZombineDev] wrote:
On Thursday, 9 March 2017 at 21:08:17 UTC, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
I'm using ddoc for the first time. I was naively expecting
something resembles dlang.org, and the results is a bit
disappointing. So I looked at dlang.org and realized lots and
lots of ddoc templates are required to achieve that.
As the developer of a tiny package that nobody cares, I want
to have a nice looking documents page, but I don't want put
too much (or any!) time into it. And I don't care whether my
documents have any "personality". I guess a lot people would
agree.
So why don't we make the defaults more beautiful? Or make the
dlang.org templates easier to adopt for average users?
My favorite one is: https://github.com/MartinNowak/scod.
BTW, the default ddox (the one that comes with dub) is getting
an upgrade soon:
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox/pull/149
https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox/pull/150.
I tried ddox, and it worked pretty well. Only problem is that,
ddox uses the json output of dmd, which is different from dmd -D
result. dmd -D will include the then-branch of static-ifs and
version blocks that's been compiled in, but the json output
doesn't.
Is this by design? Or can we make the json output consistent with
the ddoc output?
