On Sunday, 21 May 2017 at 19:11:46 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Looks cool, but it'd still want a GC closure, won't it?
No, it just generates the same struct you'd write manually. That should work fine with @nogc now.
Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d Sun, 21 May 2017 12:46:33 -0700
On Sunday, 21 May 2017 at 19:11:46 UTC, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
Looks cool, but it'd still want a GC closure, won't it?
No, it just generates the same struct you'd write manually. That should work fine with @nogc now.