On Friday, 16 June 2017 at 13:54:54 UTC, Wulfklaue wrote:
On Friday, 16 June 2017 at 13:14:46 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
Fifth time you are being intentionally inflammatory and trying
to twist my post.
Well, i am sorry that you see it all as intentionally
inflammatory.
Only those specific instances where you used expressions designed
to elicit an emotional response.
You might have noticed that after responding to you, my post
was more general. Not person specific. My apology to you for
the misunderstanding.
The trouble is that you replied to two different people in the
same post (this is btw not very well supported by newsgroups, for
which the forum is a frontend) and even after becoming more
general kept referring to points I made in my post.
I will not post about this anymore.
That is your choice, though I fail to see why you think you
shouldn't.
I think you should keep reporting such issues in the ecosystem,
since without that there is indeed no way they are ever going to
be dealt with. It's just that reporting in and of itself does not
guarantee a fix with our current human resources. If you want
such a guarantee, it's on you to convince someone (be that
yourself or someone else) to do it.
No point wasting anybody there time. Its not like anything is
going to change anyway, that much is now clear to me.
It shouldn't, because it's not the case. The ecosystem is being
worked on, albeit slowly. No progress != slow progress.
