Huh? You were asked about concrete action points that in your
PoV would improve dlang.org. You can't just say "make it (like)
python.org" ;-)
Could you maybe try to be a bit preciser and create a more
detailed lists of points on how you would improve dlang.org?
Sorry I can't.
Make it look more like "python.org" is just and exactly what I
mean.
For instance, D is the only scripting language I would use
nowadays.
BUT I would not take the risk to use D instead of C++ to develop
games for instance.
D is actually quite easy to sell a scripting language.
Convincing people to use D instead of C, C++, Java or C# is
another thing.
In my personal case, selling D as a better alternative to Python,
JavaScript or Ruby would have just needed a well chosen snippet
of simple code, which shows me that indeed D is some kind of
strongly-typed JavaScript, à la TypeScript, which is both easy to
learn and use.
And I believe that "python.org" is currently more convincing for
"low-profile" programmers/scripters than "dlang.org".
Just look at the code snippets...
