dsimcha wrote:
If anyone sees any harm in keeping opApply other than a slightly larger language spec, please let me know. Despite its having been superseded by ranges for a subset of use cases (and this subset, I will acknowledge, is better handled by ranges), I actually think the flexibility it gives in terms of how foreach can be implemented makes it one of D's best features.
Thanks for writing this. It's nice to have a compelling argument, and you gave one. Looks like opApply is staying.
