Walter Bright wrote:
dsimcha wrote:
If anyone sees any harm in keeping opApply other than a slightly
larger language
spec, please let me know. Despite its having been superseded by
ranges for a
subset of use cases (and this subset, I will acknowledge, is better
handled by
ranges), I actually think the flexibility it gives in terms of how
foreach can be
implemented makes it one of D's best features.
Thanks for writing this. It's nice to have a compelling argument, and
you gave one. Looks like opApply is staying.
I think the same. Thanks, David.
Andrei
