On 4 July 2017 at 23:27, Wulfklaue via Digitalmars-d < digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 at 04:49:29 UTC, Manu wrote: > >> I've been using code-d for a while, and it generally works well. I've >> also noticed there's another plugin available, which at the time I first >> looked, appeared to be older and less-featured than code-d. >> > > dlang-vscode.dlang seems to be more alive at pure minimum. Webfreak his > code-d is more up to date and more easy to install. Well, months ago it was > my impression. > > The issue is sometimes some plugin authors take breaks. And sometimes the > latest versions of D break something, making it impossible for the plugins > to compile the dependencies. So its better the have choice then. > > Is it better to have one plugin where both authors work upon. Yes. Will it > happen: Probably not. > Right, and this is why I'm trying to make a plea to the respective authors; please consider merging the projects. The situation is bad. If the only meaningful factor keeping these things separate is ego, then it's objectively bad for the community.
