On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 17:37:42 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 7 November 2017 at 17:27:30 UTC, bauss wrote:
Which this operator has already proven to be in other
successful languages.
Not exactly this variation, but I get your point. On the other
hand, so has hundreds of other operators from other
languages... So which one should one not implement?
Anyway, I've already shared my viewpoints on the flaws of "?:"
as proposed.
Yes. My point wasn't entirely for the addition of this operator,
but in general for every good idea around here.
Honestly I don't care too much if it gets implemented or not.
It'll be a great addition, but in my own opinion it's not life or
death.
