On 29.11.2017 17:58, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/29/17 11:45 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 29.11.2017 17:21, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/29/2017 07:53 AM, Seb wrote:
UDAs for function arguments would be really awesome to have.
They should be part of the same DIP. -- Andrei
More generally, any declaration should ideally support UDAs.
One issue with UDAs on function arguments is that function types will
then have embedded UDAs, so the DIP should specify how that works.
Wouldn't it work the same as this?
@("foo")
struct S
{
}
void main()
{
import std.stdio;
@("bar") S s1;
S s2;
writeln(__traits(getAttributes, s1)); // bar
writeln(__traits(getAttributes, typeof(s1))); // foo
writeln(__traits(getAttributes, s2)); // (nothing)
writeln(__traits(getAttributes, typeof(s2))); // foo
}
-Steve
I don't understand what you mean. Function types _contain_ parameter
declarations. (Including attributes and default initializers.)
