On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 09:21:20 UTC, codephantom wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 December 2017 at 09:03:31 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
The point is that the presence of one @safe: line in the
module can be mechanically checked, over one million devs
working on a codebase.
The whole point of Walter argumentation is 'mechanically'.
/Paolo
My C/C++ code can be 'mechanically' checked too.. and those
checks are better than they've even been, and getting better.
IMHO, the lost list of vulnerability in code shipped by "first
class enterprises" is just crying out that C/C++ is not
mechanically checkable.
And we are talking about company that can literally spend an
Everest of money on that.
/Paolo
