On 12/26/2017 3:54 AM, codephantom wrote:
I simply have to 'forget' to annotate with @safe
Not annotating with @safe is mechanically checkable as well.
Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all !
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:01:24 -0800
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Mark via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Dan Partelly via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... codephantom via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... rjframe via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... rjframe via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Maybe D is right about GC after all... Paolo Invernizzi via Digitalmars-d
