On 16.01.2018 22:46, jmh530 wrote:
On Tuesday, 16 January 2018 at 21:21:04 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
My thoughts were:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/p3e4al$1jfc$1...@digitalmars.com
A starting point could be an unnamed tuple built-in tuple type, but also
not yet deprecating the built-in named tuple type in std.typecons.
...
(That's what the current version of the DIP proposes. It does not aim to
deprecate std.typecons.Tuple, it merely redirects it.)
But as it has been requested more than once and it is a feature of
existing Phobos tuples, I can add a proposal to the DIP that can be
accepted/rejected independently, and add a few words to the
"limitations" section.
Sometimes when you give someone the option to agree or disagree to a
bunch of different choices it's harder to come to agreement than if you
keep things simple.
I'm perfectly fine with leaving it out for now.
