On 23 March 2018 at 12:16, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 3/23/2018 11:09 AM, Manu wrote: >> >> [...] > > > You make some good points. The CTFE one is kinda inexcusable on our part, > because it was trivial to implement (just more or less add some table > entries and some glue copying existing examples), and there were posts after > posts here and on bugzilla talking about it and nobody doing anything about > it. > > Rvalue references are not trivial and can have major unintended > consequences. They're a rather ugly feature in C++, with weirdities. I doubt > D will ever have them.
... totally started a new thread (sorry!) ;) > Regarding ARC, we've tried on that front numerous times. Still we don't have > a good RC solution, but it isn't for lack of trying. I understand, and I don't feel like I've been hammering this one into the dirt unfairly. Work appears to be ongoing, and I'm watching with interest. It has been a very long time coming though. I feel like it's a breakthrough that we're all pretty much in agreement that it should exist! That was a long fight on its own ;) > [...] Oops, new thread ;)