On Saturday, 24 March 2018 at 16:37:06 UTC, Manu wrote:
I'm not sure why I seem to have to defend the idea that it's a
*great
thing* that D (in theory; according to the advertising
brochure) does
away with these requirements.
Manu is not the only one who has to write such programs because
of ^^ (log, exp, cosh, sinh, tanh... need pow to be CTFE to be
CTFE themselves).
It's a lot more unconvenient, and plain different semantics
(can't parameterize the table based on a compile-time value) when
compared to having working CTFE.
