On Friday, 25 May 2018 at 03:09:26 UTC, Neia Neutuladh wrote:
On Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 23:22:56 UTC, IntegratedDimensions
wrote:
If you can't find validity in the suggestion based on it's own
inherent usefulness than the only way I can convince you is to
provide examples that you actually find useful... that makes
it difficult on my part and is not fair to me.
You are asking us all to do work for you. You're asking
everyone to learn about this new language element. (And yes, we
would have to learn, since it means the compiler is less able
to find errors in our code, because more code is valid.) You're
asking Walter Bright or another compiler developer to implement
this feature for you, and write the tests, and write the
documentation, and support this new code for years.
Show me where I asked you to do any work for me. You are an
imbecile. Just trying to stir up trouble because you obviously
don't know how to read. You didn't like my response and so you
are being a dick... simple as that. I'm sure you will get your
supporters... some dicks like to other dicks.
This is not an impossibly huge request, but it isn't trivial by
any means. There are two socially acceptable ways to get people
to implement something you want: convince them it's worthwhile,
or pay them.
Um, no, it is trivial. You just want to be an ass. It was already
proved trivial by aliak. You just have some chip on your shoulder
and are trying to make a general point when this is a specific
problem.
Compare: there's no socket.io client or server library for D.
You should implement one. Does my saying so make you inclined
in any way to write a socket.io library?
What is your point? Where the fuck did I say that anyone needed
to implement this feature? I like you parse things in ways that
suit your agenda. Very convenient for you.
You seem to have a big problem communicating in a normal fashion.
I tried to communicate on your level. Hopefully you understand me
this time.
