On 2009-12-15 22:41:19 -0500, "Steven Schveighoffer"
<schvei...@yahoo.com> said:
2. the choice of inout is not my first choice, I'd prefer a new
keyword. The inout compromise was meant to subvert the "we already
have too many keywords" argument (it was Janice's idea). If there are
no objections, I prefer what the DIP proposed, vconst. All I'm saying
is, reusing inout is *not* a very important part of the proposal.
Seconded. In fact, we could just remove inout from the keyword list if
we care about not augmenting the number of keywords.
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/
