On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:06:02 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 03/24/2010 02:11 PM, Moritz Warning wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:55:12 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> [..] > > Absolutely. I never know the full logic by which dmd.conf is found, it's > quite convoluted. You may want to submit a bugzilla enhancement request. > I don't think the dmd binary is essential, after all you launched it so > you can do a which dmd or whatever. I wouldn't know how to do that on Windows. Linux beginners might have the problem on Linux. - That one additional line wouldn't hurt.
> But the name of the module being compiled would help. I am not sure what you mean. Do you mean "dmd -v" should write out the module name that is compiled at that moment? Sounds good.
