On 03/24/2010 04:35 PM, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:06:02 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 03/24/2010 02:11 PM, Moritz Warning wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:55:12 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[..]
Absolutely. I never know the full logic by which dmd.conf is found, it's
quite convoluted. You may want to submit a bugzilla enhancement request.
I don't think the dmd binary is essential, after all you launched it so
you can do a which dmd or whatever.
I wouldn't know how to do that on Windows.
Linux beginners might have the problem on Linux.
- That one additional line wouldn't hurt.
But the name of the module being compiled would help.
I am not sure what you mean.
Do you mean "dmd -v" should write out the module name that is compiled at
that moment? Sounds good.
Yes. If there's a module declaration output that, otherwise output the
module name as inferred from the file name.
Andrei
