It would be nice to say "in this function, assume numeric literals are
of type T," but that might be too specific a solution (could only apply
to builtin types). I don't think it's feasible for the compiler to
infer what type it should use.
-Steve
It would be nice indeed!
My proposal"ish" idea was exactly for this problem,
that removing "default literal" rule, and treating every implicit constant
(constant without literal) as a generic type.
I don't think it will ever happen even if i was able to provide full
parsing framework, since C is a strong opponent :)
Thanks!
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
