On 10-04-29 10:49 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 04/29/2010 09:39 AM, SHOO wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu さんは書きました:
Thanks! You are now a Phobos developer.
I'm happy to join member of Phobos developer!
> Unfortunately you cannot commit
your changes to std.date because it infringes on Tango's license.
Andrei
What did I infringe the license of Tango for? For interfaces? For
implements?
I've written the codes without the intention. Please tell me the points
that are the problem.
I don't know other details except that a Tango representative explicitly
warned us about the potential infringement yesterday. You may want to
check with the Tango team. I am sorry for the disappointment this must
entail to you.
The current direction considered for std.date is to take the design of
Boost.Date_Time as a starting point.
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_42_0/doc/html/date_time.html
I wonder how hard it would be to do a simple transliteration of
boost.date_time into D as a first step? Might it expedite development if
we could take not just the design, but the actual working code, as a basis?
The optimistic newbie in me imagines that such a transliteration
wouldn't be too difficult, since so many C++ idioms map directly into D.
Graham
